Effect of eCG on in vitro embryo production in beef cattle in the dry tropics

  • Lizeth Montserrat Medina Pérez Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
  • Francisco Javier Gutiérrez Piña Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
  • Francisco Javier Trejo Meza Centro de Mejoramiento, Unión Ganadera Regional de Tamaulipas
  • Alejandro Espinoza Canales Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
  • Alberto Muro Reyes Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas
  • Arnoldo González-Reyna Universidad de Taumalipas, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-8108
Keywords: eCG, Follicular aspiration, ultrasonography, Oocyte, blastocyst, In vitro embryo production

Abstract

The effect of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) was evaluated on follicular development and oocyte morphology through follicular aspiration (OPU) and its relationship with In Vitro production of embryo in beef cows. Nine Bos taurus and Bos indicus cows were used, cows were 3 to 7 years old, with an average weight of 700 (±120 kg) kg, these cows were subjected to OPU according to the experimental protocol. The cows were kept in buffel grass (Cenchrus Cilaris sp.) with mineral and food supplementation. The cows were divided in 4 groups, with an structural nested design, 3 different breeds x 4 eCG dosages (0 Ul, 1000 Ul, 2000 Ul and 3000Ul), with 3 repetitions per dosage. The ovarian cycle was synchronized with an intravaginal device (CIDR-B®, 1.9 g) and 0.7 ml estradiol benzoate, during 7 days, plus corresponding dosage of eCG, followed by OPU at CIDR withdrawal. After every OPU session, the oocytes were washed and was evaluated and incubated with In Vitro maturation media (MIV) in an Eve incubator, at 38.5ºC and 5% of CO2. After the MIV incubation, oocytes were placed in fertilization media (FIV) and fertilized; 18 hours post-fertilization, plates were placed in embryo incubation media (CIV) and incubated for a further 48 hours and the the media was changed and incubated for a further 96 hours. At this time, blastocyst rate was estimated. There were significant effects of breed (P<0.05), however, eCG dose did not affect oocyte quality nor blastocyst rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arnoldo González-Reyna, Universidad de Taumalipas, Mexico

Profesor Emérito, Reproducción Animal, División de Estudios de Postgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas,

References

Baruselli, P. S., B. L. C. Catussi, L. A. De Abreu, F. M. Elliff, L. G. Da Silva, and E. O. S. Batista. 2019. Challenges to increase the AI and ET markets in Brazil. Animal Reproduction, 16(3):364-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0050
Block, J., P. J. Hansen, B. Loureiro, and L. Bonilla. 2011. Improving post-transfer survival of bovine embryos produced in vitro: Actions of insulin-like growth factor-1, colony stimulating factor-2 and hyaluronan. Theriogenology, 76 (9):1602-1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.025
Bousquet, D., H. Twagiramungu, N. Morin, C. Brisson, G. Carboneau, and J. Durocher. 1999. In vitro embryo production in the cow: An effective alternative to the conventional embryo production approach. Theriogenology, 51:59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00231-3.
Callesen, H., T. Greve, and F. Christensen. 1987. Ultrasonically guided aspiration of bovine follicular aspiration. Theriogenology, 27:217 (Abstract).
Comisión Nacional del Agua. (CNA). 2018. Disponible en: http://smn.cna.gob.mx/es/informacion-climatologica-ver-estado?estado=tamps
Evans, A. C. O., F. Mossa, S. W. Walsh, D. Scheetz, F. Jimenez-K., J. F. H. Ireland, G. W. Smith, and J. J. Ireland. 2012. Effects of maternal environment during gestation on ovarian folliculogenesis and consequences for fertility in bovine offspring. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 47(S4):31-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02052.x
Mapletoft, R. J., K. Bennett Steward, and G. P. Adams. 2002. Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle. Reproduction, Nutrition and Develpment, 42:601-611. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002046
Merton. J. S., A. P. W. de Roos, E. Mullaart, L. de Ruigh. L. Kaal, P. L. A. M. Vos, and S. J. Dielemen. 2003. Factors affecting oocyte quality and quantity in commercial application of embryo technologies in the cattle breeding industry. Theriogenology, 59(2):651-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01246-3
Pieterse, M. C., K. A. Kappen, M. Kruip, and M. Taverne. 1988. Aspiration of bovine oocytes during transvaginal ultrasound scanning of ovaries. Theriogenology, 30:751-762. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(88)- 90310-X.
Quispe, C., E. Fernández, E. Ancco, K. Oriundo, y E. Mellisho. 2015. Efecto de la raza de la donadora sobre la cantidad y calidad de ovocitos recuperados por aspiración folicular guiada por ultrasonografía transvaginal. Spermova 5: 59-62. doi: 10.18548/aspe/0002.13
S. A. S. 2004. Statistical Analysis System, Stastistics Visual, Version 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc. Campus Drive, Cary, NC, E. U. A.
Trejo Meza, F. J., Y. Bautista Martínez, M. Ruiz Albarrán, E. A. López Acevedo y A. González Reyna. 2020. El efecto de la raza de la donadora sobre la producción de embriones in vitro bajo condiciones de trópico seco del noreste de México. In: Producción de embriones de donadoras de bovinos de carne en el trópico seco de México, A. González Reyna (Ed.), Edit. Acad. Esp., Beau Basin, Mauritius, pp. 69-156. ISBN 978-620-0-43029-8.
Watanabe, Y. F., Souza, A. H., Mingoti, R.D., Ferreira, R. M., Batista, E. O. S., Dayan. A., Watanabe, O., Meirelles, F. V, Nogueira, M. F. G., Ferraz, J. B. S., Baruselli, P.S. 2017. Number of oocytes retrieved per donor during OPU and its relationship with in vitro embryo production and field fertility following embryo transfer. Anim. Reprod. 14(3):635-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR1008.
Published
2023-06-15
How to Cite
Medina Pérez, Lizeth Montserrat, Francisco Javier Gutiérrez Piña, Francisco Javier Trejo Meza, Alejandro Espinoza Canales, Alberto Muro Reyes, and Arnoldo González-Reyna. 2023. “Effect of ECG on in Vitro Embryo Production in Beef Cattle in the Dry Tropics”. Archivos Latinoamericanos De Producción Animal 31 (Suplemento), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310513.