Bacterial contamination of Propofol vials at three post-opening time points

  • Joseline A. Márquez Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad de Cuenca
  • Christian I. Ortiz Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad de Cuenca
  • Katherine Solano León Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad de Cuenca https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3335-1894
  • Marcela E. Abril Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. Universidad de Cuenca
Keywords: presence of bacteria, contamination, storage conditions

Abstract

This study assessed microbial contamination in 1% Propofol vials. The results indicated that vials stored at room temperature exhibited higher bacterial growth and greater resistance to various antibiotics compared to those stored under refrigeration. The research was conducted at the veterinary clinic of the University of Cuenca. One group of vials was maintained at room temperature, while the other was refrigerated. The first sampling site was the rubber stopper, which was swabbed with a saline solution (0.9%). The swabs were then stored in Stuart transport medium. The second sampling involved aspirating 0.1 ml from the vial contents using a 1 ml syringe, with the samples placed in tubes without additives. Sample collection occurred at three time points (days 0, 7, and 14). The maximum bacterial presence recorded was 200 CFU/ml in 6 out of 8 vials by the end of the study. Bacterial growth was observed in 25% of the vials by day 7, increasing to 75% by day 14. Notably, an increased presence of Staphylococcus spp. was detected in 5 out of 6 contaminated vials on day 14.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arduino, M. J., Bland, L. A., McAllister, S. K., Aguero, S. M., Villarino, M. E., McNeil, M. M., Jarvis, W. R., & Favero, M. S., 1991. Microbial growth and endotoxin production in the intravenous anesthetic Propofol. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 12(9), 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1086/646405
Aydin, N., Aydin, N., Gultekin, B., Ozgun, S., & Gurel, A., 2002. Bacterial contamination of Propofol: the effects of temperature and lidocaine. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 19(6):455-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026502150200073x
Cuevas, C., Mancilla J., Muños J., 2019. El efecto inhibitorio del EDTA sobre el crecimiento microbiano en suspensiones de propofol. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología, 42(2):104-10. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rma/v42n2/0484-7903-rma-42-02-104.pdf
Galeotti, G., 2009. Farmacocinética del Propofol en infusión. Educación Continua, 67(2):154-85.
Rioja, E., Martínez, F., Martínez, M., & Salazar, V., 2022. Manual de anestesia y analgesia de pequeños animales con patologías o condiciones específicas. 2da edición. Ediciones Esdra. ISBN 9788418706202.
Sarzosa Troya, M. S., & Enrique Vazquez, J., 2024. Contaminación del Propofol, expuesto a temperatura ambiente. Alfa Publicaciones, 6(1.1):78-98. https://doi.org/10.33262/ap.v6i1.1.457
Zorrilla-Vaca, A., Arevalo, J. J., Escandón-Vargas, K., Soltanifar, D., & Mirski, M. A., 2016. Infectious disease risk associated with contaminated Propofol anesthesia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 22(6):981-92. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2206.150376
Published
2024-10-14
How to Cite
Márquez, Joseline A., Christian I. Ortiz, Katherine Solano León, and Marcela E. Abril. 2024. “Bacterial Contamination of Propofol Vials at Three Post-Opening Time Points”. Archivos Latinoamericanos De Producción Animal 32 (Supl 1), 151-53. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.320517.