Beef cattle: do we really want them that docile?

  • Ana Clara Gonzalez Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
  • Héctor Ricardo Ferrari Universidad de Buenos Aires
Keywords: temperament, selection, animal welfare, livestock farming

Abstract

In beef livestock farming, highly fearful or aggressive animals are undesirable and hence culled mainly due to production and work safety issues. It is seemingly believed that the more docile an animal, the better its husbandry. The present article challenges the fact of rearing extremely docile cattle in any productive context and aims to critically approach temperament as a functional feature to grassland-based production systems. Under agroecological conditions similar to the species’ ancestral environment, an intermediate expression of docility would be likely better as it contributes to enhanced biological fitness. Likewise, animal welfare is being invoked as genetic improvement criteria to take into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bourdon, R.M., 1988. Bovine nirvana-from the perspective of a modeler and purebred breeder. Journal of Animal Science, 66: 1892-1898. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.6681892x
2. Burrow, H.M., 1997. Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 65: 477-496.
3. Cooke, R.F.; Arthington, J.D.; Araujo, D.B. y Lamb, G.C., 2009. Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temperament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of Brahman-crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science, 87: 4125-4132. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2021
4. D’Eath, R.B., Conington, J., Lawrence, A.B., Olsson, I.A.S. y Sandøe, P., 2010. Breeding for behavioural change in farm animals: practical, economic and ethical considerations. Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium ‘Darwinian selection, selective breeding and the welfare of animals’ Bristol, 2009. Animal Welfare, 19: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600002207
5. Dingemanse, N.J., Van der Plas, F., Wright, J., Réale, D., Schrama, M., Roff, D.A., Van der Zee, E. y Barber, I., 2009. Individual experience and evolutionary history of predation affect expression of heritable variation in fish personality and morphology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 9 pp. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1555
6. Falconer, D.S. y Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Editorial Longman Group Ltd, England, 464 pp. ISBN 978-0-494-55438-8.
7. Grandin, T. y Deesing, M. J., 2022. Behavioral genetics and animal science. En: Grandin T. (Ed.). Genetics and the behavior of domestic animals. Elsevier, United Kingdom, pp. 1-47. ISBN: 978-0-323-85752-9.
8. Friggens, N. C., Blanc, F., Berry, D. P. y Puillet, L., 2017. Deciphering animal robustness. A synthesis to facilitate its use in livestock breeding and management. Animal, 11(12): 2237-2251.
9. Mendl, M., Burman, O.H.P., Parker, R.M.A. & Paul, E.S., 2009. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118: 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023
10. Réale, D., Reader, S.M., Sol, D., McDougall, P.T. y Dingemanse, N.J., 2007. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82: 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x
Published
2024-10-27
How to Cite
Gonzalez, Ana Clara, and Héctor Ricardo Ferrari. 2024. “Beef Cattle: Do We Really Want Them That Docile?”. Archivos Latinoamericanos De Producción Animal 32 (3), 117-19. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.320305.
Section
Opinion