Effect of the size and sex of the pigs at the beginning of the finishing phase on productive indicators at the end of fattening

Keywords: Segregation by sex at weaning, growing-finishing, productive behavior, commercial quality

Abstract

The effect of segregation by sex and size at the start of the growing-finishing stage on traits at the end of the fattening and at slaughter was studied in commercial pigs, 121 Danbreed×Pietrain pigs were used, entire males and females. They were divided in good and bad males, and good and bad female groups (G). They were housed in 9 m2 pens. The pigs received clean, fresh water, and ad libitum food and water. The initial weight varied from 12.4±2.0 to 25.3±2.3 kg. The target weight was 115 kg. Fattening was divided into growth (0-60 d) and finishing phases (60-120 d). The response variables were initial (P1), intermediate (P2), and final weight (P3); total feed intake (CMD); daily weight gain between P1 and P2 (GDP1y2), P2 and P3 (GDP2y3), and P1 and P3 (GDP1y3); and feed conversion ratio (CA). The pigs that reached the target weight in 114 d were termed "first quality", the "second quality" in 122 d, the "underachievers" did not reach this weight in 122 d. The GLM procedure of SAS and statistical analysis with learning machines in R were used to analyze the of productive variables and to determine the factors affecting the quality of the pigs at the end of fattening. The females exceeded (P≤0.0263) the males by 2.72 kg and 0.05 kg d-1 for P2 and GDP1y2. The sex*G interaction affected (P≤0.0181) P3, GDP1y3, and GDP2y3. Sex of pig and G were not the most important factors to classify quality at the end of fattening. Regrouping pigs by sex and size at the beginning of the growth-finishing phase affected significantly the productive performance and indirectly influences quality at the end of fattening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andretta, I., C. Pomar, M. Kipper, L. Hauschild, and J. Rivest. 2016. Feeding behavior of growing–finishing pigs reared under precision feeding strategies. Journal of Animal Science, 94:3042–3050.
Brumm, M. C., M. Ellis, L. J. Johnston, D. W. Rozeboom, D. R. Zimmerman, R. H. Hines, D. D. Jones, V. D. Leibbrandt, G. W. Libal, S. J. Moeller, B. Richert, T. E. Soucha, K. Stalder, and R. C. Thaler. 2002. Effect of removal and remixing of lightweight pigs on performance to slaughter weights. Journal of Animal Science, 80:1166–1172. doi:10.2527/2002.8051166x. https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/80/5/1166/4789495
Brumm, M. C., L. J. Johnston, and D. W. Rozeboom. 2006. Effects of removal and remixing of heavyweight pigs on performance to slaughter weights. The Professional Animal Scientis, 80:12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ardhaskell/12
Cámara, L., J. D. Berrocoso, A. Fuentetaja, C. J. López-Bote, C. de Blas, and G. G. Mateos. 2016. Regrouping of pigs by body weight at weaning does not affect growth performance, carcass quality or uniformity at slaughter of heavy weight pigs. Animal Science Journal, 87:134–142. doi:10.1111/asj.12404.
Douglas, S. L., S. A. Edwards, E. Sutcliffe, P. W. Knap, and I. Kyriazakis. 2013. Identification of risk factors associated with poor lifetime growth performance in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 91:4123–4132. doi:10.2527/jas2012-5915. https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/91/9/4123/4717274
van Ferneij, J. P. 2022. Situación de la castración de cerdos en la Unión Europea. 3tres3 México. https://www.3tres3.com/es-mx/articulos/situacion-de-la-castracion-de-cerdos-en-la-union-europea_3512/
FIRA. 2022. FIRA Perspectivas 2022. FIRA, México. 84 pags.
Flohr, J. R., M. D. Tokach, J. M. DeRouchey, J. C. Woodworth, R. D. Goodband, and S. S. Dritz. 2016. Evaluating the removal of pigs from a group and subsequent floor space allowance on the growth performance of heavy-weight finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 94:4388–4400. doi:10.2527/jas.2016-0407.
Garitano, I., C. Liébana, E. F. de Vargas, Á. O. Moreno, and A. Daza. 2013. Effect of gender on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat and fat composition of pigs slaughtered at 125 kg of live weight destined to Teruel (Spain) ham production. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 12:95–100. doi:10.4081/ijas.2013.e16.
Hardge, T., and S. McOrist. 2007. Cuál es el valor económico de una variabilidad baja del peso corporal? 3tres3 México. https://www.3tres3.com/es-mx/articulos/cual-es-el-valor-economico-de-una-variabilidad-baja-del-peso-corporal_1088/
IBM. 2021. Nodos de árbol de decisión: conceptos básicos - Documentación de IBM. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/docs/es/spss-modeler/saas?topic=options-decision-tree-nodes-basics
Jaturasitha, S., S. Kamopas, T. Suppadit, R. Khiaosa-ard, and M. Kreuzer. 2006. The effect of gender of finishing pigs slaughtered at 110 kilograms on performance, and carcass and meat quality. ScienceAsia, 32:297–305. doi:10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2006.32.297.
Latorre, M. A., R. Lázaro, D. G. Valencia, P. Medel, and G. G. Mateos. 2004. The effects of gender and slaughter weight on the growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics of heavy pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 82:526–533. doi:10.2527/2004.822526x. https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/82/2/526/4834434
López-Vergé, S., J. Gasa, M. Farré, J. Coma, J. Bonet, and D. Solà-Oriol. 2018. Potential risk factors related to pig body weight variability from birth to slaughter in commercial conditions. Translation Animal Science, 2:383–395. doi:10.1093/tas/txy082.
Medel, P., and A. Fuentetaja. 2000. Efecto del perfil genético, del sexo, del peso al sacrificio y de la alimentación sobre la productividad y la calidad de la canal y de la carne de cerdos grasos. Reporte del XVI Curso de Especialización FEDNA. FEDNA, 113-139.
O’Connell, N. E., V. E. Beattie, and D. Watt. 2005. Influence of regrouping strategy on performance, behaviour and carcass parameters in pigs. Livestock Production Science, 97:107–115. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.03.005.
O’Quinn, P. R., S. S. Dritz, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, J. C. Swanson, J. L. Nelssen, and and R. E. Musser. 2001. Sorting growing-finishing pigs by weight fails to improve growth performance or weight variation. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 9:11–16. http://www.aasv.org/shap.html.
Patience, J. F., A. D. Beaulieu, and H. W. Gonyou. 2003. Variation in pig performance: can we do anything about it?. Report of Prairie Swine Centre, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 36.
Piao, J. R., J. Z. Tian, B. G. Kim, Y. I. Choi, Y. Y. Kim, and K. Han. 2004. Effects of sex and market weight on performance, carcass characteristics and pork quality of market hogs. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 17:1452–1458.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/
Statistical Analysis System (SAS). 2021. SAS/STAT 9.4 User´s Guide. Cary, N. C. USA: SAS Institute.
Wolter, B. F., and M. Ellis. 2001. The effects of weaning weight and rate of growth immediately after weaning on subsequent pig growth performance and carcass characteristics. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 81:363–369. doi:10.4141/A00-100.
Published
2023-06-15
How to Cite
Gómez Montejo, Pablo, Marleni Michelle Montiel Pérez, Antonio González de Bulnes López, Elena Castillo Cavero, Jonathan Emanuel, Rufino López Ordaz, and Agustín Ruíz Flores. 2023. “Effect of the Size and Sex of the Pigs at the Beginning of the Finishing Phase on Productive Indicators at the End of Fattening”. Archivos Latinoamericanos De Producción Animal 31 (Suplemento), 121-30. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310522.