Carcass characteristics of lambs in grazing and confinement

  • Saúl Hernández Aquino Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-9429
  • Juan González Maldonado Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3863-786X
  • Rodrigo Flores Garivay Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
Keywords: grazing, ryegrass, meadow

Abstract

In sheep production fed high-forage diets, lower quality carcasses are generally observed compared to sheep fed high-concentrate diets. However, the use of concentrates raises the cost of production, so one of the alternatives is to include grazing periods during the fattening of lambs. Therefore, the objective of the study was to determine if the inclusion of grazing periods during the fattening of lambs affects the carcass characteristics. For which, 28 recently weaned lambs (Dorper × Pelibuey × Katahdin) were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: fattening in pen (EC) and fattening in grazing and pen (EPC). In EPC the first 51 days were given morning access to a ryegrass meadow. The characteristics of the carcass did not present a significant difference (p≤0.05) between treatments. Therefore, it is concluded that the inclusion of grazing periods during the fattening of lambs does not affect the characteristics of the carcass.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, A., & De los Santos-Montero, L. A. (2019). What is driving livestock total factor productivity change? A persistent and transient efficiency analysis. Global Food Security, 21(March), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.06.001

De Brito, G. F., Ponnampalam, E. N., & Hopkins, D. L. (2017). The Effect of Extensive Feeding Systems on Growth Rate, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality of Finishing Lambs. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12230

Hamdi, H., Majdoub-Mathlouthi, L., Picard, B., Listrat, A., Durand, D., Znaïdi, I. A., & Kraiem, K. (2016). Carcass traits, contractile muscle properties and meat quality of grazing and feedlot Barbarine lamb receiving or not olive cake. Small Ruminant Research, 145, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.028

Kusch-Brandt, S. (2020). Towards more sustainable food systems—14 lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114005

Makkar, H. P. S. (2018). Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal, 12(8), 1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700324X

Orzuna-Orzuna, J. F., Dorantes-Iturbide, G., Lara-Bueno, A., Mendoza-Martínez, G. D., Miranda-Romero, L. A., López-Ordaz, R., & Hernández-García, P. A. (2021). Productive Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality in Finishing Lambs Supplemented with a Polyherbal Mixture. Agriculture, 11(10), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100942

Silva, P. C. G., Brandão Ferreira Ítavo, C. C., Vinhas Ítavo, L. C., Nadai Bonin Gomes, M., Dias Feijó, G. L., Monteiro Ferelli, K. L. S., Silva Heimbach, N., Silva, J. A., Melo, G. K. A., & Filgueira Pereira, M. W. (2020). Carcass traits and meat quality of Texel lambs raised in Brachiaria pasture and feedlot systems. Animal Science Journal, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13394

Somasiri, S. C., Kenyon, P. R., Kemp, P. D., Morel, P. C. H., & Morris, S. T. (2015). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of lambs grazing forage mixes inclusive of plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) and chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Small Ruminant Research, 127, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.04.005

Published
2022-10-11
How to Cite
Hernández Aquino, Saúl, Juan González Maldonado, and Rodrigo Flores Garivay. 2022. “Carcass Characteristics of Lambs in Grazing and Confinement”. Archivos Latinoamericanos De Producción Animal 30 (Supl. 1), 139-42. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.300516.